Thursday, 09th September 2010

   home     about     authors     news     physics forums         RSS feed     sitemap     privacy     physics archives     free magazines
Good Screen Names - Science Articles Science Articles

Physics Articles

folder add to favorites
folder make home page

blank
Astronomy/Cosmology
Education
How Stuff Works
Mathematics
Mystics/Pseudo Science
Other Sciences
Physics
Technology
Theoretical Physics

Our Newsletter



Subscribe
Unsubscribe
  Voting Poll

We will most likely find life on...
Titan
Mars
Europa
Callisto
Other


  Featured Book

  Physics Tip


Viscosity
The property of a liquid that makes it resist flow or any change in the arrangement of its molecules. The higher the viscosity, the "thicker" a liquid seems.


 

  Physics Quote


It is impossible to trap modern physics into predicting anything with perfect determinism because it deals with probabilities from the outset.
    Sir Arthur Eddington (1882 - 1944)

 

 
 
 

Good Screen Names
Author: Jon Johnson
Added: 04/30/2003
Type: Summary
Viewed: 255104 time(s)
Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10Average visitor rating of 7.1/10

How would you rate this article:    Bad Good   Go » 

  

Page 2

As huge as this number is, it’s nothing if you’re talking about brute forcing an AIM password. With AIM, you have 4-16 character case sensitive passwords. The vast majority of users will only use a-z, A-Z, 0-9, and space in their passwords, so let’s calculate that first. 63 characters in a 4-16 range,

16
å  63^x = 62,574,537,913,733,490,154,880,900,481- 62.5 octillion.
n=4

That would take about 19,842,255,807,247,000,000 years to crack at 100/second.

It doesn’t stop there. AIM allows more than just your standard alphanumerics. Most people don’t use other characters, but some do. The standard character table understood by AOL’s applications is 255 characters. 4-16 characters in length with a field of 255 characters? Damn.

16
å  255^x = 320,884,951,674,586,670,638,888,924,819,449,050,625
n=4

The name for that number is 320.88 undecillion[3]. Still cracking at 100 tries per second? 101,751,950,683,220,000,000,000,000 (101.75 septillion) millennia to crack every POSSIBLE AIM PASSWORD WITH 100 TRIES PER SECOND.

Fortunately, for those heathens out there still cracking passwords, a lot users don’t use good passwords. People choosing bad passwords is the only reason cracking even works. There are only about 114,000 words in the English language… the vocabulary of most people is around 7,000-8,000. About 50,000 likely passwords… considering reversals, common mixes with numbers, names, sports teams… etc. At the rate we’ve been using, it would take far less than an hour.

Most screen names that are stolen are not cracked. Very rarely are cracks actually effective. Knowing the magnitude of the numbers presented here makes the notion of brute forcing an screen name risible.

Not only would it take longer than this planet has existed, to store a list of those passwords would require massive amounts of data storage. We’ll use the formula 36^x*x. Each character is one byte; so multiply the number of words for the given length by that length to get the number of bytes… as in 36^4 is 1,679,616, the number of possible 4 character passwords… 1,679,616 times 4 bytes each.

16
å  ((36^x)*x) = 130,742,935,654,335,813,385,574,400 bytes; 108.148 YB[4],[5]
n=4

and,

16
å  ((255^x)*x) = 5,132,895,900,211,990,719,707,896,462,761,718,346,250
n=4

5.133 duodecillion bytes… 4,245,831,974,908,300 YB.

To summarize this entire essay, it is quite impossible to brute force the password word to someone else’s screen name. Hopefully, if you still try to crack screen names, you’ll grow out of it, or for God’s sake at least rely on Trojans and exploits rather than any kind of cracking.



Article Pages:  « Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next »  
                          


  Article Comments   Add Comment | View All (17)


Poster: Nonchalant in Newtown
Added: -0/6-/2005

Dude, but dude seriously.
That is intense, i think i might sleep safer at night now.
But what if multiple computers were connected together working together? Like a copious amount of hardware driven to solve such a difficult task?
Bah, there are a lot of idiots in the world whose passwords either are compromised of 1234 or their pet's name.

Poster: Bob
Added: -0/1-/2005

The number you refer to as 5.9 octillion is actually only 5.9 septillion. -regards
Poster: anna
Added: -0/6-/2004

This is not at all what I thought this site was about. I'm just trying to think of a new screen name.
Poster: goon
Added: -0/4-/2004

um yea this is all pretty confusing if u ask me, but i think its kinda cool that someone had enough time to do that
Poster: hottie
Added: -0/3-/2004

oh, sure, the articles great...does the author have good balls, cuz i'm ready for some real sex!
Poster: rain
Added: -0/3-/2004

most crackers on aol run at 1k+ on dialup and on cable 4k+ a min so think about that one if you had a cracker that got faster with more ram and you had a tb of ram and a good cabel connetion ... how fast would that be the 4k is 256ddr ram
Poster: alexi
Added: -0/2-/2004

all i wanted was a new sn... talk about false adveritisin and junk
Poster: n30
Added: -0/2-/2004

i just want a 3 char
Poster: james
Added: -0/1-/2004

well according to my reseach the math here is all wrong. I can up with 457 diffrent possible names. My handy texas instruments Ti 400 never lies..get it together guys
Poster: Jocelyn
Added: -0/1-/2004

Ummm......I just want to make a new screen name. So.....yea :-\
Poster: bryan s - sn: XecureID
Added: -0/1-/2004

man that guy is smart, and actually there are 33,696 3 char sns exactly.
Poster: asfg43qt
Added: -0/1-/2004

For the 3 chars, There is about 34k since they cant begin with numbers.
Poster: Christine
Added: -0/1-/2004

I think making a screenname here is wack!
Poster: Jerred
Added: -1/2-/2003

i dont know if you mean cracking passwords ever was hard or now but back when i was in like 8th, 9th grade(now a junior in college) i'd say i cracked up to 6000 passwords with bruteforce. and my claim to fame, and how i got my handle back then oso, was cracking the 3 letter sn "oso". the password was sony. heh, how dumb where those days.
Poster: mike
Added: -1/2-/2003

got a lot of time on ur hands i c
Poster: "A"
Added: -1/2-/2003

Ohhhhh Thats a big number!!!
Poster: Physics Guest 1
Added: -0/7-/2008

You visit many interesting concepts. I just don't know if I agree with your deemphasis on brute force as a viable method for procuring data that is not yours to begin with. I guess it all depends on the algorithms... let's see an article on cryptology!
Top  



Advanced Search

recent Recent Science Articles



Recent Articles function is down for the time being as we update the script. Stay tuned for a better and more updated news rotator.


links Science Links


Physics Post is just one of many quality physics sites on the web. Contact us if you feel you've found a diamond in the rough.

Astronomy and Cosmology

Chemistry

Credit Counselors

General Discussion

Philosophy

Securities Brokerage

Technology


 

Physics Songs

 
We provide daily science articles, physics articles and science news.
Our mission is to create a wide array of basic and advanced science articles for you to read and expand your science knowledge. Content here is not reviewed for accuracy, we rely on the expertise of the authors and the peer review in the comments section. If you want to submit a physics or science article please contact us.
All content © 2010, Physics Post. .